Investment PolicyStatement

Drawing of Amy and David Chandler Hall, Gordon Ford College of Business
Contents
  1. 1Purpose of This Statement
  2. 2Fund Background and Mission
  3. 3Performance Benchmark
  4. 4Roles and Responsibilities
  5. 5Portfolio Structure
  6. 6Permitted Investments
  7. 7Prohibited Investments and Practices
  8. 8Trading Practices
  9. 9Cash Policy
  10. 10Annual Withdrawal
  11. 11Risk Management and Compliance
  12. 12Maintenance Mode
  13. 13Conflicts of Interest and Code of Ethics
  14. 14Amendments
  15. 15Reporting
  16. 16Adoption

This Investment Policy Statement (“IPS”) governs the management of the Student Managed Investment Fund (“the Fund”) of the Gordon Ford College of Business at Western Kentucky University. It is binding on all parties involved in the management of the Fund, and no provision may be waived, suspended, or amended except through the formal amendment process described in Section 14.

1 Purpose of This Statement

The IPS defines the Fund’s objectives, permissible and prohibited investments, risk limits, governance structure, decision-making procedures, and reporting requirements. It exists so that every participant—student, faculty, and board member—operates from a single, unambiguous set of rules, and so that the Fund’s conduct can be audited against a written standard at any time.

2 Fund Background and Mission

The Fund was established with an allocation of $1.5 million and operates as an ongoing, equity-only portfolio managed by students enrolled in FIN 439 (Security Analysis & Portfolio Management) under the supervision of the Faculty Advisor and the oversight of the SMIF Oversight Board.

The Fund’s assets are, and remain, assets of the College Heights Foundation (“CHF”). The Fund is held in a separate account within CHF’s investment portfolio, and CHF treats it as one of its investment managers: a U.S. equity manager benchmarked to the Russell 3000. The Fund complements, and does not replace, CHF’s allocations to fixed income, alternative investments and other asset classes, which remain with CHF’s other managers.

The Fund is perpetual, and each cohort of students inherits the portfolio left by the last. Investment decisions should therefore reflect a long-term horizon; the Fund is not managed to any semester-end or fiscal-year date. The Fund seeks a long-term total return sufficient to support an annual withdrawal of 4% of Fund assets (Section 10) while preserving the real value of its capital. Its performance objective is to outperform the Russell 3000 Total Return Index over rolling three-year periods, net of costs (Section 3). Within each sector budget, student selections aim to outperform the sector ETF they replace.

The Fund accepts equity market risk commensurate with its benchmark, and only the risks a disciplined professional equity manager would accept. It does not accept leverage risk, derivative risk, or short-sale risk. The annual withdrawal is a standing obligation of the Fund, and investment decisions shall be made with that ongoing distribution in mind.

The Fund is established to advance student learning and long-term investment performance in equal measure, under the standards of care expected of a professional fiduciary.

The Fund exists to give students direct, accountable experience in security analysis, portfolio management, compliance, and fiduciary decision-making, and to manage its capital with the discipline expected of a professional portfolio. Neither objective is subordinate to the other. A well-run learning process is expected to produce sound investment decisions, and sound investment decisions are the clearest evidence of what students have learned. All policies in this IPS shall be interpreted in light of this dual commitment.

3 Performance Benchmark

3.1 Policy Benchmark

The Fund’s benchmark is the Russell 3000 Total Return Index, which covers nearly all of the investable U.S. equity market. A total-market benchmark matches the universe from which students may select: any U.S.-listed company that meets the criteria in Section 6.3, including mid-sized and small companies outside the S&P 500.

The Fund’s passive core is held in S&P 500 sector ETFs (Section 5), which cover the large-company portion of the benchmark. The Fund’s return relative to the benchmark therefore has two parts, which are reported separately (Section 15):

3.2 Sector Benchmarks

The benchmark for each sector budget is the sector ETF in which that budget’s base is held. Each team’s contribution to Fund performance is evaluated against the sector ETFs of its assigned sectors.

3.3 Measurement

Returns are measured as time-weighted total returns, net of trading costs and fund expenses, so that the annual withdrawal and any other external cash flows do not affect the comparison with the benchmark. Performance is evaluated over rolling three-year periods and reported annually and since inception. The benchmark may be changed only by amendment under Section 14.

4 Roles and Responsibilities

4.1 Oversight Board

The Oversight Board consists of five members: the Finance Department Chair; two finance faculty members, one of whom shall be the Faculty Advisor; a representative of the Investment Department of Cerity Partners; and Donald Smith. The Board:

4.2 Faculty Advisor

The Faculty Advisor is the faculty member currently teaching FIN 439 (Security Analysis and Portfolio Management). If the course is not offered in a given term, or more than one faculty member is teaching it, the Department Chair shall designate the Faculty Advisor for that term. The Faculty Advisor:

Students shall not execute trades directly under any circumstances.

4.3 Student Investment Committee

The Student Investment Committee consists of the students enrolled in FIN 439 each semester, organized into sector teams. At the start of each semester the Faculty Advisor assigns each team two GICS sectors of the S&P 500, so that every sector is covered, and each team manages the sector budgets described in Section 5. Because there are eleven sectors, one team covers a single sector.

Students originate every investment decision. Each purchase or sale of a stock begins as a written proposal from a sector team, which the team presents and defends before the Faculty Advisor and the class. The class questions and critiques each proposal, and once its pre-trade compliance checklist is complete and verified, the other sector teams vote on it under Section 4.4. A team whose proposal is rejected may revise and resubmit it. The Fund trades a stock only on a student proposal; the Faculty Advisor trades without one only for the purposes listed in Section 4.2.

Each sector team shall complete:

  1. Buy-side analyst reports. Written reports on stocks within the team’s assigned sectors, each recommending either (a) the purchase of a security the Fund does not hold, or (b) the sale of a security the Fund holds;

  2. A compliance report. When designated by the Faculty Advisor, a month-end report testing the full portfolio against every IPS limit. Two teams are designated each month and prepare their reports independently of one another;

  3. Team presentations. Two presentations each semester to the Faculty Advisor and the class.

No individual student or team holds trading authority.

4.4 Proposal Voting

A proposal goes to a vote only after its pre-trade compliance checklist (Section 11.1) is complete and verified by the Faculty Advisor. Each of the five sector teams other than the proposing team then casts one vote, for or against, as decided by its members. The outcome follows from the number of votes against:

Votes for Votes against Outcome
5 or 4 0 or 1 Approved
3 2 Referred to the Faculty Advisor, who approves or rejects
2 or fewer 3 or more Rejected

The Faculty Advisor executes every approved proposal within two business days of its approval. Each vote, and any Advisor decision on a referred proposal, is recorded with the proposal. A rejected proposal may be revised and resubmitted.

5 Portfolio Structure

The Fund operates under a Base Camp Model. Under the Base Camp Model, the sector ETF is the base camp for every dollar. Capital leaves the ETF only to fund an approved selection and returns to it when that selection is sold. Each student selection is therefore a deliberate decision to outperform the ETF it replaces, and each team’s contribution to Fund performance can be assessed directly against its sector ETF. Within each sector budget, capital moves as follows:

5.1 Sector Budgets

Each GICS sector’s budget equals that sector’s weight in the S&P 500 multiplied by total Fund assets, set at each rebalancing date. A team’s budget is the sum of the budgets of its assigned sectors. The Faculty Advisor pairs larger sectors with smaller ones so that workloads are comparable across teams. Table 1 shows an illustrative assignment.

Illustrative sector budgets for a $1.5 million Fund, using approximate S&P 500 sector weights as of October 23, 2026. Actual budgets are set at each rebalancing date.
Team Assigned sectors Weight Budget
1 Information Technology, Materials 39.7% $595,500
2 Financials, Real Estate 13.7% $205,500
3 Communication Services, Consumer Staples 13.8% $207,000
4 Consumer Discretionary, Energy 12.9% $193,500
5 Health Care, Utilities 11.9% $178,500
6 Industrials 8.0% $120,000
Total 100.0% $1,500,000

5.2 Initial Deployment

When CHF transfers the Fund’s assets, the Faculty Advisor shall invest all Fund assets, less the cash permitted under Section 9, in the sector ETFs at S&P 500 sector weights, in five approximately equal daily purchases over the first five trading days. Spreading the purchases over a week averages the entry price. The Fund is therefore fully invested within its first week, and student selections are added over time as proposals are approved, within the limits of Section 5.4. The Fund does not use mutual funds at any stage.

5.3 Replacement Mechanics

5.4 Replacement Limit

Student selections may make up only a limited share of each sector budget, with the remainder held in the sector ETF. The limit increases in phases, measured by semesters of Fund operation from the date of initial funding:

The limit is tested at the time of each purchase. A sector whose student selections exceed the limit solely because of market movement, or because sector ETF shares were sold to fund the annual withdrawal (Section 10), is not required to sell, but no new purchase may be made in that sector until the proposed purchase would keep selections within the limit.

The 80% limit is the standing maximum. The Oversight Board may, at its discretion, raise the limit for any sector up to 100% of that sector’s budget, or lower it for any sector, for example after repeated IPS breaches or sustained underperformance of that sector’s selections. A lower limit applies to new purchases at once. Selections already held above a lowered limit need not be sold immediately; the covering team brings the sector within the new limit through its own sale proposals before the end of the following semester, unless the Board sets a different schedule.

5.5 Rebalancing

At the start of each semester, the Faculty Advisor shall reset sector budgets to current S&P 500 sector weights by trading sector ETFs only. The Faculty Advisor sells sector ETF shares in each sector whose total holdings (sector ETF plus student selections) exceed its new budget, and uses the proceeds to buy the sector ETFs of sectors whose holdings fall short of their budgets. Student selections are never sold to rebalance. If a sector’s student selections alone exceed its new budget, that sector’s ETF is sold in full and the sector is treated under the replacement limit in Section 5.4. In the semester designated for the annual withdrawal, the reset is made on Fund assets after the withdrawal (Section 10).

6 Permitted Investments

6.1 Sector ETFs

One ETF for each of the eleven GICS sectors, each tracking the corresponding S&P 500 sector index and each with an expense ratio not exceeding 0.10%. The Faculty Advisor selects the ETF family; the Fund intends to use the Select Sector SPDR ETFs.

6.2 Portfolio Positioning

The Fund is a U.S. equity portfolio anchored in large companies. Its core is large-capitalization: every sector ETF holds S&P 500 companies. Students may also select mid-sized and small companies meeting Section 6.3, within the replacement limits of Section 5.4. Micro-capitalization companies are excluded by the $300 million minimum market capitalization. The Fund holds no fixed income, alternative investments, leverage or derivatives (Section 7); its only cash equivalent is a money-market fund (Section 9).

6.3 Individual Securities

Common stock of U.S.-listed companies meeting all of the following criteria at the time of purchase:

7 Prohibited Investments and Practices

The following are prohibited without exception:

8 Trading Practices

To keep the Fund long-term in outlook and simple to administer:

9 Cash Policy

The Fund is fully invested under normal operations. Cash and money-market holdings should not exceed 2% of Fund assets and shall not exceed 5% at any time. Each dividend is credited to the sector budget of the holding that paid it and, at each month-end, reinvested in that sector’s ETF. Dividends therefore remain in the sector that earned them, and each security’s, sector’s and team’s return includes its own income. During Maintenance Mode dividends accumulate in cash, recorded by sector, and are reinvested in their sectors’ ETFs at the next rebalancing. Other cash receipts are reinvested in the sector ETFs in proportion to sector budgets. Uninvested cash shall be held in a money-market fund or equivalent. Proceeds raised to fund the annual withdrawal (Section 10) and awaiting transfer are excluded from these limits.

10 Annual Withdrawal

The Fund is subject to an annual withdrawal of 4% of its assets. The withdrawal is a standing obligation of the Fund and is made as follows:

Any change to the withdrawal rate or method requires amendment under Section 14.

11 Risk Management and Compliance

11.1 Pre-Trade Compliance

Before any proposal goes to a vote, the sector team sponsoring it shall complete a written pre-trade compliance checklist documenting that the proposed trade complies with every provision of this IPS. The Faculty Advisor shall independently verify the checklist before the vote. No proposal may be voted on, and no trade executed, without a completed and verified checklist.

11.2 Position Review Trigger

Any position declining 25% or more from its cost basis triggers a mandatory review: the covering sector team shall prepare a written re-underwriting of the position recommending to hold, trim, or exit, and that recommendation is decided by vote under Section 4.4. The trigger compels a documented decision; it is not an automatic stop-loss.

11.3 Ongoing Monitoring

Every position is monitored continuously, at three levels:

During Maintenance Mode (Section 12), when no class is in session, the Faculty Advisor performs the month-end compliance test and continues the weekly review. Any position that crosses the review trigger in Section 11.2 during a break is flagged, and its covering team completes the re-underwriting within the first two weeks of the following semester. Material developments during a break are logged and briefed to the incoming teams at the start of that semester.

11.4 Breach Remediation

Any IPS breach shall be remedied within 30 days. If the Student Investment Committee fails to act within that period, the Faculty Advisor is authorized to execute the minimum transaction necessary to restore compliance. All breaches and remediation actions shall be reported to the Oversight Board.

12 Maintenance Mode

During winter and summer breaks, and during any period in which FIN 439 is not in session, the Fund operates in Maintenance Mode:

13 Conflicts of Interest and Code of Ethics

Each student, the Faculty Advisor, and each Oversight Board member shall disclose in writing any material personal or family interest in a security under consideration. A student with a disclosed conflict shall not take part in preparing, presenting or voting on the related proposal, and the recusal shall be recorded. If the Faculty Advisor has a disclosed conflict, any decision the Advisor would make on that proposal shall be referred to the other finance faculty member of the Oversight Board. Material nonpublic information shall not be used or sought under any circumstances.

14 Amendments

This IPS may be amended only by majority vote of the Oversight Board. The Student Investment Committee or the Faculty Advisor may propose amendments in writing, accompanied by a rationale. No amendment shall take effect retroactively, and no amendment may be adopted by the Student Investment Committee acting alone.

15 Reporting

Each month, the two sector teams designated by the Faculty Advisor shall prepare independent compliance reports, which the Faculty Advisor shall reconcile. Each year, the Fund shall submit a formal written report to the Oversight Board that includes performance versus the benchmark, separated into selection and structure (Section 3), attribution by sector team, the annual withdrawal and how it was funded, the complete trade log, all breach reports and remediation actions, and a compliance attestation signed by the Faculty Advisor. Each year, the Fund’s results shall be presented publicly.

16 Adoption

This Investment Policy Statement was adopted by the SMIF Oversight Board and approved by the Dean of the Gordon Ford College of Business on the following date:

Date

Department Chair
Faculty Advisor
Donald Smith
Dean, Gordon Ford College of Business